Divorcing couples tend to row over seemingly trivial items, lawyers have revealed
u00a0
The petty disputes were revealed after research by Manchester law firm Pannone found one in five divorces feature rowsu00a0over inexpensive possessions.
u00a0
Even seven-figure separations can be delayed because of disputes about ownership of items worth no more than just a fewu00a0pounds, they found.
u00a0
The resulting disputes are so bitter that they end up inflating legal bills far beyond what it would cost to buy replacements, theu00a0lawyers said.
Among the most bizarre cases was the unnamed husband who took his emotional attachment to a favourite frying pan to ludicrous extremes.
"His wife took it when she moved out, so he took her engagement ring in a bid to get revenge," the Daily Mail quoted David Milburn, his lawyer, of Stowe Family Law, as saying.
u00a0
Representational picture
u00a0
"When everything was resolved, they had to meet each other halfway between their new properties at a motorway serviceu00a0station to exchange the items," he said.
u00a0
Another of his clients had asked for help to win custody of delicacies her ex-husband had taken from the kitchen of theu00a0marital home.
u00a0
"I've also been instructed by a client to write to her former spouse to return some smoked salmon and expensive mustard heu00a0had taken out of the freezer," Milburn revealed.
u00a0
"I explained that the legal fees in pursuing this would buy her a lot of smoked salmon, but she was adamant we pressedu00a0ahead anyway," he said.
u00a0
Family partner Fiona Wood said some ex-husbands and wives are prepared to run up significant legal bills to win âcustody' ofu00a0seemingly trivial items such as CDs, books, cutlery, Air Miles, Tesco Clubcard points, goldfish and vacuum cleaners.
u00a0
"Some couples fight simply for the sake of fighting," she said.
u00a0
"The amount spent on legal costs arguing about these items can be many times more than their value, but some would ratheru00a0pay these costs in order to prove a point to their ex-spouses," she said.
u00a0
Other possessions fought over by couples have included a suit of armour in a baronial hall, dustbins in the shape of Disneyu00a0characters, and sporting trophies.
u00a0
In many cases, the only winners are the lawyers.
u00a0
Amanda McAlister, head of family law at Russell Jones & Walker, handled a divorce involving a couple who ran an equestrianu00a0centre and jointly owned a valuable stallion.
u00a0
The entire financial settlement came down to the division of horse semen.
u00a0
"You'd be surprised at how couples, who can split pretty sizeable assets without much problem, are willing to waste thousandsu00a0of pounds on the smallest or oddest possession," she said.
u00a0
"The key is to keep a cool head and look on it as a business deal.
u00a0
"Unfortunately, few people do, and it can become a battle for ownership over items that, in the great scheme of things, areu00a0pretty unimportant when compared with your financial security and the welfare of your children," she said.
u00a0
"I have seen couples divide multi-million pound fortunes with comparative ease, only for negotiations to founder over au00a0cherished but ultimately worthless ornament," Beth Wilkins, a partner and joint head of family law at JMW Solicitors, said.u00a0
