29 August,2024 07:00 AM IST | Mumbai | Agencies
Representational image. Pic/iStock
The Bombay High Court on Wednesday granted bail to Pune-based builder Avinash Bhosale in a money-laundering case, noting that at the end of the trial he may not be found guilty of the offence he is being prosecuted for.
Bhosale, chairman and founder of ABIL Group, was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate in June 2022. He had been initially arrested by the CBI in a corruption case, and obtained bail from the high court in that case in May.
Justice Manish Pitale on Wednesday granted Bhosale bail in the ED case on a personal bond of Rs 1 lakh.
"There are reasonable grounds to believe that the applicant (Bhosale) is not guilty of the offences for which he is being prosecuted. The applicant is already granted bail in the predicate offence (registered by the CBI)," Justice Pitale said.
ALSO READ
Three Singapore apex court judges share ceremonial benches at Bombay High Court
Bombay HC transfers Abhishek Ghosalkar's murder case probe to CBI
Mumbai: One week after hawker election, doubts prevail
HC allows cutting of mangroves for new railway lines in Mumbai
Mumbai: 75 per cent attendance must in law colleges, UGC reaffirms
According to the ED, Bhosale received kickbacks from Yes Bank founder Rana Kapoor, also an accused in the case, in return for diverting funds.
Yes Bank, under Rana Kapoor, had disbursed Rs 3,983 crore to Deewan Housing Finance Limited (DHFL), which were proceeds of crime.
Of this amount, DHFL sanctioned and disbursed loans aggregating to Rs 2,420 crore to three group concerns of Radius Group, headed by Sanjay Chhabria, also an accused in the case.
Bhosale allegedly received Rs 350 crore kickbacks from Radius group for facilitating loans from DHFL in the form of consultancy services payments, ED alleged.
ED has relied on three major transactions between Bhosale's companies and DHFL and Radius group.
Bhosale in his bail plea, however, contended that the allegations were misconceived, and these were all legitimate business transactions and returns on investments made in 2014-2015.
His counsel Aabad Ponda also raised the grounds of prolonged incarceration and the fact that trial would take some time to conclude.
ED counsel Hiten Venegaonkar said there was sufficient material to make out a strong prima facie case to show that Bhosale was beneficiary of proceeds of crime.
The high court, however, noted that the transactions showed that amounts were being returned pursuant to investments made by Bhosale in 2014-15, and as per mutually agreed covenants.
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever