17 March,2023 12:20 PM IST | Mumbai | PTI
Bombay High Court. File Pic
The Bombay High Court on Thursday was irked with the Maharashtra government's persistent stand that the reservation benefits given to orphans cannot be extended to abandoned children. The state should instead be working as a protective umbrella for such kids, it said.
The state government offers one per cent reservation in education to orphaned children.
However, it refused to extend such a benefit to children who have been abandoned by their parents as they are not orphaned as per the definition of the term.
A division bench of Justices Gautam Patel and Neela Gokhale had taken up the issue after a petition was filed by a city-based NGO seeking reservation for two girls, abandoned by their parents.
ALSO READ
Three Singapore apex court judges share ceremonial benches at Bombay High Court
Bombay HC transfers Abhishek Ghosalkar's murder case probe to CBI
Mumbai: One week after hawker election, doubts prevail
HC allows cutting of mangroves for new railway lines in Mumbai
Mumbai: 75 per cent attendance must in law colleges, UGC reaffirms
After being slammed by the court, the government had agreed to provide orphan certificates to the two girls so that they could seek reservation but had clarified that its stand was that there was a difference between orphaned and abandoned children.
Irked with this stand, the court said in every single matter the government operates with contradiction.
Why this attitude of we have to combat...we have to oppose? When will this government wake up to the realisation that it is not the only one right and is most often wrong, the court said.
Also Read: Former Maharashtra minister Hasan Mushrif moves Bombay HC against ED case
The bench also expressed its anguish at the affidavit filed by Sharad Ahire, joint secretary of the Women and Child Development Department, justifying the government's stand.
The bench said the affidavit was scurrilous and reprehensible.
The affidavit had said that parents/guardians abandon or surrender their child intentionally or deliberately to a childcare institute and misuse the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, so that schooling, boarding, lodging and all other facilities are provided.
The court questioned if the government understood under what dire circumstances a parent abandons a child.
The gender may hinder me from understanding the plight of a mother abandoning a child. Even as a father, it is unimaginable, Justice Patel said.
The court added that the state government ought to act as a protective umbrella for all such children instead of creating a distinction between orphaned and abandoned children.
The court said it would pass its judgment on the issue on March 31.
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever