07 March,2021 02:48 PM IST | Mumbai | PTI
Bombay High Court. File Pic
The Bombay High Court has quashed a last year's order of the Animal Welfare Board of India which suspended recognition of Mumbai-based Universal Animal Welfare Society and directed for closure of its sterilisation centre.
A division bench of Justices Amjad Sayed and Madhav Jamdar set aside the order on March 2 and a copy of the HC's judgment was made available on Sunday.
The high court directed the Animal Welfare Board of India to first issue a show cause notice and give a hearing to the Universal Animal Welfare Society.
The HC passed the judgment on a petition filed by the Universal Animal Welfare Society challenging the December 14, 2020 order suspending the petitioner's recognition and directing it to close down its centre in suburban Malad.
ALSO READ
Three Singapore apex court judges share ceremonial benches at Bombay High Court
Bombay HC transfers Abhishek Ghosalkar's murder case probe to CBI
Mumbai: One week after hawker election, doubts prevail
HC allows cutting of mangroves for new railway lines in Mumbai
Mumbai: 75 per cent attendance must in law colleges, UGC reaffirms
The suspension and closure order was passed after the Animal Welfare Board received complaints of alleged cruelty towards animals at the centre and stray dogs not being treated properly while carrying out birth control programmes.
The HC said, "We are of the view that before taking such drastic action of suspension of recognition granted to the petitioner for conducting Animal Birth Contract Programme and closing down the centre of the petitioner, the petitioner ought to have been given an opportunity of being heard."
Even the inspection report of the Animal Welfare Board of December 11, 2020 is completely lacking in particulars, the court said.
"If the Animal Welfare Board of India desires to take action against the petitioner, it shall first issue a show cause notice and share the relevant material with the petitioner," the high court said.
The petitioners' advocates, Ahmad Abdi and Eknath Dhokale, argued that the Animal Welfare Board's order was illegal and bad in law, and passed in haste.
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever.
