09 May,2024 09:05 PM IST | Mumbai | PTI
Representational Pic/File
The Bombay High Court on Thursday expressed its displeasure over the proposed usage of a plot of land in Pune reserved as open space to construct a godown to store EVMs (electronic voting machines) and VVPAT (voter verifiable paper audit trail) machines.
A division bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Arif Doctor noted what concerned it was not the change of use of the plot but the manner in which it was being done by district authorities without following any procedure mandated in law, sending a wrong signal in the process.
"We understand conducting elections is an overwhelming public purpose in our democracy, but even for this law should be followed," CJ Upadhyaya observed, adding "What else is lawlessness if we permit this."
Polling for the Pune Lok Sabha seat will be held on May 13.
ALSO READ
Three Singapore apex court judges share ceremonial benches at Bombay High Court
Bombay HC transfers Abhishek Ghosalkar's murder case probe to CBI
Mumbai: One week after hawker election, doubts prevail
HC allows cutting of mangroves for new railway lines in Mumbai
Mumbai: 75 per cent attendance must in law colleges, UGC reaffirms
A Pune resident, Prashant Raul, had filed a public interest litigation (PIL) in the HC claiming the Metro Eco Park at Ravet in the western Maharashtra city was proposed to be used to construct a godown to store EVMs and VVPAT machines.
Raul's advocate Ronita Bhattacharya told the bench that the site was reserved as a recreational space for citizens and around 600 plants and trees have been planted there as part of compensatory plantation for the Pune Metro project.
As per the plea, in February, a letter was sent by the Maharashtra government to the district collector for usage of the open space and an adjacent plot (both belonging to the Pune Metropolitan Regional Development Authority) to construct a godown.
The adjacent plot was reserved for government purposes.
The district collector then took possession of the two plots and began construction activity.
The High court, however, queried as to how possession of the land was taken without following any procedure.
"How was it done? Is there any law which permits such a requisition without compensation? We understand conducting elections is an overwhelming public purpose in our democracy, but even for this law should be followed," CJ Upadhyaya said.
"What concerns us is not the change of use (of the plot) but the manner in which it is being done. It sends a wrong signal. What else is lawlessness if we permit this. A lay man may think oh, this is an important thing for elections, but no," the HC chief justice remarked.
The court questioned if the authorities plan to leave any open space for citizens or just make a concrete jungle.
Senior counsel Ashutosh Kumbhakoni, appearing for the district collector, told the court the godown was being constructed on the plot reserved for government purposes.
"We are not going to construct anything on the plot reserved as an open space and we are not going to fell any tree in that open space," Kumbhakoni assured the court.
The bench accepted the statement and posted the matter for further hearing on June 18 and directed all respondents to file their affidavits by then.
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever
