29 August,2023 12:15 PM IST | Thane | mid-day online correspondent
School students hold the national flags in Bikaner. Pic/PTI file
Police has registered a case against a man from Maharashtra's Thane district for allegedly insulting the national flag, an official said on Tuesday.
A person from Dombivali in a police complaint claimed the man, from the Ulhasnagar area, last year posted a cropped image of the national flag on his Facebook profile, showing it as placed on his leg, a police spokesperson said quoting the complaint.
This amounted to insult of the national flag, the complainant claimed.
Based on the complaint, a case was registered on Sunday against the man under the Prevention of Insults to National Honor Act 1971, the official said.
ALSO READ
Ajit Pawar-led NCP to contest MLC election from Mumbai Teachers constituency
Shiv Sena's Shivaji Shendge to contest polls from Mumbai Teachers' constituency
Mid-Day Top News: Maharashtra assembly polls likely only after Diwali and more
Special | Maharashtra assembly elections: Who’s the real NCP in Mumbra-Kalwa?
Maharashtra assembly elections: Want unity, not CM post, says Uddhav Thackeray
What is the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act
Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971, has provisions aimed at preventing the desecration or insult of national symbols, including the national flag, the Constitution, the national anthem, and the Indian map.
Section 2 - Insults to Indian National Flag and Constitution:
It prohibits burning, mutilating, defacing, defiling, disfiguring, destroying, trampling upon, or any other form of disrespect towards the Indian National Flag or the Constitution of India.
The act applies to both spoken and written words, as well as acts.
Offenders can be punished with imprisonment for up to three years, a fine, or both.
Also read: Truck engulfed in flames on Mumbai-Ahmedabad highway disrupting traffic for hours
Explanation 1:
Criticism of the Constitution or the Indian National Flag or any lawful measures to amend the Constitution or alter the flag does not constitute an offense under this section.
Explanation 2:
The term "Indian National Flag" encompasses all visible representations, including pictures, paintings, drawings, photographs, or any other means made of any substance or represented on any substance.
Explanation 3:
"Public place" refers to any easily accessible place used by the public, including public conveyances.
Explanation 4 - Definition of "disrespect" to the Indian National Flag:
It includes acts of gross affront or indignity towards the flag.
Dipping the flag in salute to any person or thing, except as mandated on specific occasions.
Flying the flag at half-mast without following government instructions.
Draping the flag, except during state funerals or armed forces/paramilitary forces funerals.
Using the flag as a costume or accessory below the waist.
Embroidering, stitching, or printing the flag on items like cushions, handkerchiefs, napkins, undergarments, or dress materials.
Putting any inscription on the flag.
Using the flag as a covering or wrapper, except for flower petals during special occasions like Republic Day or Independence Day celebrations.
Using the flag to cover statues, monuments, speaker's desks, or platforms.
Allowing the flag to touch the ground, floor, or trail intentionally.
Using the flag as a drape over vehicles, trains, boats, aircraft, or similar objects.
Using the flag to cover buildings.
Displaying the flag with the saffron colour (top colour) facing downwards intentionally.
Section 3 - Prevention of singing of National Anthem:
It prohibits the prevention or disturbance of singing the Indian National Anthem during assemblies paying respect to it.
Offenders can be punished with imprisonment for up to three years, a fine, or both.
Section 3A - Enhanced penalty on second and subsequent convictions:
If a person is convicted of an offense under Section 2 or Section 3 more than once, they can be punished with imprisonment for up to one year.
These provisions aim to uphold the honor and dignity of national symbols, but their interpretation and enforcement should be balanced to ensure they do not unduly restrict freedom of expression and peaceful dissent. (With inputs from PTI)