14 September,2020 04:15 PM IST | New Delhi | PTI
Photo used for representational purpose
The Centre has told the Delhi High Court that marriage between same-sex couples was "not permissible" as it is not recognised by "our laws, legal system, society and our values."
The submission was made before a bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan by Solicitor General (SG) Tushar Mehta during hearing of a plea seeking a declaration that same-sex marriages be recognised under the Hindu Marriage Act (HMA) and Special Marriage Act.
Mehta opposed the relief sought in the petition saying "our laws, our legal system, our society and our values do not recognise a marriage, which is a sacrament, between same-sex couples".
He said the plea to grant recognition to or permit registration of such marriages was "not permissible" for two reasons -- firstly, the petition was asking the court to legislate and secondly, any relief granted "would run contrary to various statutory provisions".
ALSO READ
Centre discharges Puja Khedkar from IAS with immediate effect
Delhi HC issues contempt notice against Wikipedia
'Puja Khedkar submitted two disability certificates, possibly one is forged'
Delhi Riots Case 2020: Sharjeel Imam's plea for early hearing of bail dismissed
ED produces AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan in Delhi court, seeks 10-day custody
"Unless court does violence to various laws, this cannot be done," he added.
Mehta also said that under the HMA, the various provisions regulating marriages or prohibited relationships talk of husband and wife and therefore, who would be assigned these roles where a same-sex couple was concerned.
The bench observed that the world over things were changing, but it may or may not be applicable to India.
It, however, questioned the need for a PIL in the instant case, saying the people who claim to be affected are well educated and can themselves approach the court.
"Why should we entertain the PIL," it added.
The counsel for the petitioner stated that the affected people were not coming forward themselves as they feared reprisals and therefore, a plea was preferred.
It asked the lawyer appearing for the petitioner, Abhijit Iyer Mitra, to give details of the persons who were not permitted to register their same-sex marriage.
With the direction to place these factual aspects before the court, the bench listed the matter for further hearing on October 21.
The petition has contended that despite the Supreme Court decriminalizing consensual homosexual acts, marriages between same-sex couples was still not possible.
Catch up on all the latest Crime, National, International and Hatke news here. Also download the new mid-day Android and iOS apps to get latest updates.
Mid-Day is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@middayinfomedialtd) and stay updated with the latest news
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever
