31 March,2023 04:12 PM IST | Mumbai | PTI
Anil Jaisinghani. File Pic
The Bombay High Court on Friday reserved its order on the petition filed by alleged bookie Anil Jaisinghani challenging his ¿illegal¿ arrest in an extortion and bribery case lodged by Amruta Fadnavis, wife of Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis.
The Malabar Hill police station in south Mumbai had on February 20 registered an FIR against Jaisinghani and his daughter Aniksha for allegedly threatening to make public certain audio and video clips that purportedly show Fadnavis accepting favours from Aniksha.
The duo were booked for offences under sections 120B (criminal conspiracy) and 385 (extortion) of the Indian Penal Code and sections 8 (induce public servant using corrupt means) and 12 (abetment) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Aniksha, who was arrested on March 17, was granted bail in the case by a sessions court on March 27.
ALSO READ
Three Singapore apex court judges share ceremonial benches at Bombay High Court
Bombay HC transfers Abhishek Ghosalkar's murder case probe to CBI
Mumbai: One week after hawker election, doubts prevail
HC allows cutting of mangroves for new railway lines in Mumbai
Mumbai: 75 per cent attendance must in law colleges, UGC reaffirms
Anil Jaisinghani was arrested in Gujarat and is presently in judicial custody.
In his petition in the high court, Jaisinghani claimed that he had been illegally arrested in the case on March 19, but was not produced before the court within 24 hours as mandated in law.
Also Read: Maharashtra: One killed, two injured in attack over property dispute in Thane
His advocate Mrigendra Singh on Friday told a division bench headed by Justice A S Gadkari that Jaisinghani was produced before the court in Mumbai 36 hours after his arrest.
Singh alleged that everything in the case was being monitored by the complainant's husband who is the state's home minister.
Maharashtra' Advocate General Birendra Saraf refuted the allegations and said the police had followed all procedures properly and that there had been no delay in producing Jaisinghani before the court for remand.
The police had merely taken "possession" of Jaisinghani on March 19 and they wanted to produce him before the competent court in Mumbai, he said.
As per the arrest memo, Jaisinghani was arrested on March 20 at 5 pm and was produced before the sessions court on March 21, Saraf said.
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever