10 November,2022 03:54 PM IST | New Delhi | PTI
Jacqueline Fernandez at Patiala Court on Thursday. Pic/ PTI
A Delhi court on Friday rapped the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for adopting a pick-and-choose policy, and asked why the agency had not arrested actor Jacqueline Fernandez despite issuing a lookout circular (LOC) against her in a Rs 200 crore money laundering case involving conman Sukesh Chandrashekar.
Special Judge Shailendra Malik, who had earlier granted Fernandez interim bail, reserved order for Friday on the bail plea of the actor after hearing arguments from the lawyers appearing for Fernandez as well as the ED.
On the ED's submission that Fernandez can escape the country easily as she is not short of money, the court questioned why the actor was not arrested so far.
The agency told the court that it has issued a Lookout Circular on airports to stop the actor from leaving the country.
ALSO READ
Nations Plenary Health & Research Summit 2024 (NPHRS) Hosted at Bharat Mandapam - IECC, Government of India, New Delhi
New Delhi-Varanasi Vande Bharat develops technical snag, stopped in UP's Etawah
AAP should contest all 90 seats in Haryana on its own strength: Somnath Bharti
EAM Jaishankar wishes Brazilian counterpart on their independence day
'Over 2,700 lawyers got financial assistance under AAP govt's insurance scheme'
"Why haven't you (ED) arrested Jacqueline yet during the investigation despite issuing an LOC? Other accused are in jail. Why adopt a pick-and-choose policy,¿ the court asked the probe agency.
Also read: PMLA case: ED opposes actor Jacqueline Fernandez's bail
The accused has sought bail, saying there was no need for her custody since the investigation is already complete and the charge sheet has been filed.
The court had on September 26 granted interim bail on a personal bond of Rs 50,000.
The court had on August 31 taken cognizance of a supplementary charge sheet filed by the ED and asked Fernandez to appear before the court.
Fernandez, who was summoned by the ED several times in connection with the investigation, has been named as an accused for the first time in the supplementary charge sheet.
The ED's earlier charge sheet and a supplementary charge sheet did not mention her as an accused. The documents, however, had mentioned the details of the statements recorded by Fernandez and fellow actor Nora Fatehi.
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever.