20 April,2023 08:41 AM IST | New Delhi | Agencies
A Constitution bench during the hearing, at the Supreme Court in New Delhi, on Wednesday. Pic/PTI
The petitioners seeking legal validation of same-sex marriage on Wednesday urged the Supreme Court to use its plenary power, "prestige and moral authority" to push the society to acknowledge such a union. This would ensure LGBTQIA persons lead a "dignified" life like heterosexuals, they added.
Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for one of the petitioners, "Our parents have accepted us despite belonging to older generations. They want their children to settle in their lives. The State wants them to be ostracised. They want their parents to be ostracised. All these discriminations are needed to be wiped out."
He said LGBTQIA ((lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning, intersex, pansexual, two-spirit, asexual, and ally) have no representation in Parliament and that is why it is the courts where they have to come. Rohatgi referred to the Indian scenario before the arrival of Muslim and British rulers and said society permitted such sexual acts.
"You go to Khajuraho, sexual acts are depicted there and they are there for several hundred years...There is no European influence. British influence prevailed since they made the laws and this Victorian model of decency was imposed," he said, adding it exhibited a "colonial mindset" and must go now.
ALSO READ
Ajit Pawar-led NCP to contest MLC election from Mumbai Teachers constituency
Mid-Day Top News: Maharashtra assembly polls likely only after Diwali and more
Congress: Centre insensitive to statehood restoration demand, will be poll issue
Raut defends Uddhav's push for decision on CM's face from MVA allies
Yunus accuses Sheikh Hasina of destroying Bangladesh's institutions
Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud also dismissed the Centre's argument that the demand for right to marry is an âurban elitist' concept, reported Bar and Bench. "Government doesn't have any data to show that same-sex marriage is an urban elitist concept," he said. The five-judge constitution bench will the arguments further today.
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever