18 May,2021 09:00 PM IST | New Delhi | IANS
Photo for representational purpose
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday pulled up the Centre for not filing its reply on a plea by climate activist Disha Ravi seeking to restrain police from leaking media any investigation material in connection with FIR against her in the toolkit case.
The court made some strong remarks after it was told the Centre has not filed a response to Ravi's plea so far.
Justice Rekha Palli told Centre's counsel: "For Union of India, is there no last and final opportunity? This is very bad." The court emphasised if the reply were not filed on time, then what is the meaning of the court saying it is the last opportunity. "I cannot understand that. What is the sanctity of last and final opportunity," added Justice Palli. On March 17, the court had granted a final opportunity to the Centre to file its reply on the petition.
Central government standing counsel Ajay Digpaul informed the court that due to Covid-19, not many officials were coming to the office, due to which the response in the matter could not be filed. After Digpaul's submissions, the court said it will not impose any cost on the Centre and gave six more weeks to file its response.
ALSO READ
Congress: Centre insensitive to statehood restoration demand, will be poll issue
Important matters listed before Delhi High Court on Tuesday
Mallikarjun Kharge: No one should retire in politics
Fire in Delhi's Madanpur Khadar shanties
No water supply on Tuesday in parts of north Delhi due to maintenance work
Also Read: Climate activist Disha Ravi wonders when it became crime to think of environment
The High Court has posted the matter for further hearing in August.
On February 13, the Delhi police arrested Ravi for alleged role in sharing on social media a "toolkit" in connection with the ongoing farmers' protest against the Centre's three new farm laws. On February 23, Ravi was granted bail by a trial court.
In the plea, Ravi also sought to restrain media from publishing the content of any private chats, including WhatsApp, between her and third parties. She claimed to be severely aggrieved and prejudiced by the media trial in connection with her arrest and the ongoing investigation.
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever.