Beware of a wounded Australia

If there's one thing Australia understands better than any other team it's the merit of thought provoking self analysis.

When Australia is on a winning streak everything is done to maintain the high standard and when they lose no stone is left unturned, including a frank appraisal of their performance, to correct mistakes. Contrast that with the recent efforts of England and South Africa.

In 2005, England produced the biggest boilover since the introduction of automatic kettles to regain the Ashes and then went on a celebratory binge to mark the occasion. While England celebrated, Australia cleverly re-grouped and within 15 months the Ashes were back in Ricky Ponting's hands after a spectacular series whitewash.

In late 2008 South Africa conjured up two stunning come-from-behind wins to steal the series from a labouring Australian team. Then in the return series, with a few changes in personnel and a more aggressive approach, Ponting's team master-minded the biggest turnaround since they invented power steering to flatten a Proteas team that was still dreaming about the winning hit at the MCG.

Those two performances are a tribute to Ponting's leadership. On a number of occasions he's displayed a penchant for honest evaluation that has proved to be the ideal remedy for overcoming problems, whether they be personal or collective.

Where Ponting drives his team harder when they are successful both England and South Africa have been guilty of resting on their laurels. The lesson for all teams is; beware of a beaten Australia, they're as dangerous as a wounded Lion.

But how did the fortunes of both Australia and South Africa change so quickly and dramatically?

Two things should never be underestimated in the game of cricket; the value of an infusion of new blood and a positive state of mind. One quite often leads to the other.

A comparison of the performances of a pair of players on each team is the best way to explain the dramatic change in fortune for both teams.

The pairings are Phil Hughes with Neil McKenzie and Mitchell Johnson compared to Morne Morkel.

McKenzie is the archetypal old-approach opener who has seen all the pitfalls and bats as though one is about to open up right before his eyes. Hughes is a typical new boy; full of enthusiasm and positive vibes and he hasn't yet seen a delivery he didn't fancy. While McKenzie prefers to leave numerous balls to reach the keeper, Hughes has a lust for runs and adventure at the crease.

The latter approach has by far the more damaging affect on an opposing bowler's psyche.

Johnson and Morkel both entered the Test arena as young pace bowlers with a lot of potential and a hint of batting ability. Johnson has improved rapidly in both aspects of the game, thriving in the spotlight that has shone on him since he was prematurely thrust into the spearhead role. Morkel on the other hand is still threatening to become a lethal Test bowler and his batting has gone backwards faster than an Australian rules boundary umpire.

Johnson has become a team leader while Morkel is now wallowing in the anonymity reserved for bench players and laboratory assistants.

In the lead up to the series, South Africa talked about grandiose plans but lacked the nerve to adapt to situations which were worsening by the minute. What happened on the field didn't match their fighting words or the action that was unfolding.

Australia on the other hand was revitalised by the enthusiasm of new inductees and powered by an aggressive approach designed to overcome past faults. When confronted by an Australian side that launched a concerted attack the South Africans reacted like rabbits caught in a spotlight.

South Africa's response to this amazing form reversal has been to make changes, which is admirable except that they haven't address a major failing. Having introduced fresh blood they put a man in charge who is partly responsible for their current predicament. Jacques Kallis' refusal to react positively when the Australians challenged his authority as a batsman is part of the reason why South Africa hasn't been able to turn the tide when their innings was unravelling.

Ponting may be conservative at times when placing a field or choosing a change bowler but one can never accuse him of not setting the tone with a bat in his hand. Ponting has also set the bar high for leadership at times of crisis and any team wanting to seriously challenge Australia could do worse than follow his example of hard work and critical self-appraisal.