07 December,2022 01:28 PM IST | Mumbai | PTI
Bombay High Court. File Pic
The Bombay High Court on Wednesday said while it appreciates the work being done by the city's civic body to cover open manholes, but until then if there is any untoward incident, then the corporation would be held responsible.
A division bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Abhay Ahuja said it was concerned over the issue of open manholes across the city and sought the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) to come up with a permanent solution.
The bench was hearing a bunch of petitions raising concerns over the increasing number of potholes across Maharashtra and also open manholes.
BMC's counsel Anil Sakhare told the court on Wednesday that the civic body was addressing the issue of open manholes on a "war-footing basis" and work was on to close all such manholes.
ALSO READ
Three Singapore apex court judges share ceremonial benches at Bombay High Court
Bombay HC transfers Abhishek Ghosalkar's murder case probe to CBI
Mumbai: One week after hawker election, doubts prevail
HC allows cutting of mangroves for new railway lines in Mumbai
Mumbai: 75 per cent attendance must in law colleges, UGC reaffirms
The bench then said while the corporation's efforts are appreciated but if till then there was any untoward incident, then the BMC would be held responsible.
"Good you (BMC) are working but till then if harm is caused to anyone, we will hold you responsible. We are appreciating the BMC but what happens if a manhole is open and someone falls down," Chief Justice Datta said.
Also Read: Mumbai: BMC to finalise contractor for Gokhale bridge this week
"In such a situation, we won't ask the aggrieved person to initiate civil suit (for compensation)...we will say that your officers are responsible," he added.
The bench suggested the BMC make use of modern science and technology and devise something by which the officer concerned is alerted the moment the lid of a manhole is removed.
"In this modern day of science and technology, can't we think of something else. Why don't you (BMC) devise something by which you come to know if someone even touches the cover. Then a beep goes off in your office. Why don't you come up with something like a sensor?" the court said.
The bench also suggested use of iron grills below the manhole cover.
"You must do some progressive thinking. It is your job. We cannot keep saying what needs to be done," the court said.
The bench further said there has to be some standard operating procedure to address the issue of open manholes.
"A solution has to be provided by you. What should be the appropriate solution for this... you tell us. We need permanent measures," the HC said posting the matter for further hearing on December 19.
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever.