Updated On: 05 September, 2025 12:22 PM IST | Mumbai | Vinod Kumar Menon
The problem stems from a critical legal gap. Once a building is torn down, original residents, many senior citizens and middle-class families lose protection under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA), which governs developers and homebuyers. Since the rehabilitation component of redevelopment lies outside RERA

Tilak Safalya CHS, a MHADA building in Tilaknagar, was demolished in 2010. PICS/BY SPECIAL ARRANGEMENT
With property prices skyrocketing and Mumbai’s skyline constantly changing as one building after another gives way to redevelopment, a quieter crisis is unfolding behind the scenes—one that has left thousands of original homeowners stuck in legal limbo.
Over 6,000 redevelopment-related cases are currently pending before the Bombay High Court, many involving families who were promised new homes after their old buildings were torn down but are still waiting, sometimes for years.
The reason? A glaring gap in the law. Once a building is demolished, the original occupants—many of them senior citizens or middle-class families are no longer protected under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA), which governs homebuyers and developers. Since the rehabilitation portion of redevelopment projects doesn’t fall under RERA, these residents are left to fend for themselves.