Govt at advanced stage of consultation on reexamining colonial-era sedition law

The Supreme Court on Monday deferred hearing on a batch of pleas challenging the sedition law after the Centre said it is at an advanced stage of consultation on reexamining the colonialera penal provisionA bench of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justice J B Pardiwala noted the submission of Attorney General R Venkataramani that the government has initiated the process to reexamine section 124A of the Indian Penal CodeThe bench posted the hearing on the matter in the second week of AugustThe batch of pleas challenged the constitutional validity of the penal provision Venkataramani said the consultation process has been at the advance stage and before it goes to the Parliament it will be shown to himKindly post the matter for further hearing after the Monsoon session of Parliament he urged the benchAt the outset senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan urged the bench to constitute a bench of seven judges for adjudicating the issuesThe bench said that even if the matter has to go to seven judges it will have to be first placed before a fivejudge benchOn May 11 last year in a pathbreaking order the top court had put on hold the colonialera penal law on sedition till an appropriate government forum reexamines it and directed the Centre and states to not register any fresh FIR invoking the offenceBesides the lodging of FIRs ongoing probes pending trials and all proceedings under the sedition law across the country will also be in abeyance the top court had ruledAlso readMan held for objectionable post against UP CM Yogi AdityanathIn its significant order on the law that has been under intense public scrutiny for its alleged use as a tool against expressions of dissent including on social media the bench spoke of the need to balance the interests of civil liberties and citizens with that of the StateThis Court is cognizant of security interests and integrity of the State on one hand and the civil liberties of citizens on the other There is a requirement to balance both sets of considerations which is a difficult exerciseThe case of the petitioners is that this provision of law predates the Constitution itself and is being misused the top court had saidSedition which provides a maximum jail term of life under Section 124A of the IPC for creating disaffection towards the government was brought into the penal code in 1890 57 years before Independence and almost 30 years after the IPC came into beingIn the preIndependence era the provision was used against freedom fighters including Mahatma Gandhi and Bal Gangadhar TilakOver the years the number of cases has been on the rise with Maharashtra politician couple Navneet and Ravi Rana author Arundhati Roy student activist Umar Khalid and journalist Siddique Kappan among those charged under the provisionThis story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed agencies Midday accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability trustworthiness reliability and data of the text Midday managementmiddaycom reserves the sole right to alter delete or remove without notice the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever