Home / Sunday-mid-day / / Article /
Fashion IS political
Updated On: 15 March, 2026 08:47 AM IST | Mumbai | Team SMD
Our netas pretend they don’t care about style, or they risk being labelled frivolous. And yet, these excerpts from fashion writer Shefalee Vasudev’s new book show how women politicians use clothes to signal power

(From left) Nirmala Sitharaman’s most striking sartorial move was to replace the standard black Budget briefcase with a red folder, evoking the baniya’s traditional ledger; Mahua Moitra wears her fashion choices unapologetically, including her much-discussed Louis Vuitton bag. PIC/INSTAGRAM@mahuamoitra_fansclub; former minister Sushma Swaraj’s signature bandis that she wore over her sari were a practical choice for their handy pockets; Kangana Ranaut’s sari looks at the Parliament are always deemed elegant and classy. Pics/Getty Images
The deeply held belief that leaders must be above luxurious indulgence takes a turn towards sharper judgement when it comes to women politicians. To some extent, it explains why a self-styled politician like Mahua Moitra attracts disproportionate trolling and misogynistic sniggering. Moitra wears her fashion choices unapologetically, indifferent to their projected symbolism. She has taste, and she employs it — consciously — in defining her political persona. She is also outspoken and direct in manner. That has led to an image being pasted onto her. She is labelled as ‘firebrand’ — as if defiance must come with a warning label.
There’s a deeper complexity here. Like Moitra, who is routinely labelled ‘firebrand’ or rebellious by male politicians or political spectators, some female leaders, too, use misogynistic rhetoric when it suits them. Moitra herself got wired in that conflict. In 2023, she attacked Rekha Sharma, the chairperson of the National Commission for Women, for not holding her own umbrella during a visit to the victims of the Hathras stampede. “She is too busy holding up her boss’s pyjamas,” Moitra quipped. An FIR was lodged against her.

