History repeats itself

The Neeraj Grover murder case has strong parallels to another case that had people on the edge of their seats nearly 50 years ago. The Nanavati case as it was called grabbed headlines then. It was a crime of passion, it had drama, it had rage and it had infidelity - all the factors that resonate with people following the Grover case today

Neeraj Grover, a producer working with a private television company in Mumbai was killed by former Navy officer Emile Jerome on May 7, 2008.

Kannada actor Maria Susairaj walked free on Saturday, July 2, 2011. She along with her lawyer and brother Richard at the Press Club, Mumbai

Neeraj was killed after Emile Jerome came to Mumbai and found him naked in his fianc ufffde, Kannada actor Maria Susairaj's Malad apartment in Dheeraj Solitaire building. After Grover was killed, his body was cut in 300 pieces with a knife and disposed off in the Manor forest near Thane.

A local court on Thursday (June 30) convicted Susairaj and Jerome, in the killing.
u00a0
The court convicted Jerome under section 304 (Part I) for culpable homicide not amounting to murder and Maria under section 201 of the Indian Penal Code for destruction of evidence. Neither Jerome nor Maria was held guilty of murder (under section 302 of IPC).

Maria has walked free as the maximum sentence slated for the offence against her was a three-year imprisonment, which she had already served during the trial period.

Jerome faces imprisonment for 10 years even as the prosecution has expressed shock at the verdict and said it will appeal against the judgment.

THE NANAVATI CASE
Kawas Manekshaw Nanavati vs. State of Maharashtra was a 1959 Indian court case where Nanavati, a Naval Commander, was tried for the murder of Prem Ahuja, his wife's lover. With Nanavati frequently away on assignments, the lonely Sylvia fell in love with Prem Bhagwandas Ahuja, a friend of Nanavati.
u00a0
On April 27, 1959, Nanavati returned home from one of his assignments and finding Sylvia aloof and distant, he questioned her. Sylvia, who now doubted Ahuja's intention to marry her, confessed about the affair to her husband.
u00a0
Nanavati went to the Naval base, collected his pistol on a false pretext from the stores along with six cartridges, completed his official duties and proceeded to Ahuja's office. On not finding him there went straight to his flat.

At Ahuja's residence, Nanavati confronted him and asked him whether he intended to marry Sylvia and accept their children. After Ahuja replied in the negative, three shots were fired and Ahuja dropped dead.

"The Tragedy of the Eternal Triangle." Source: Blitz, October 17, 1959

Nanavati headed straight to confess to the Provost Marshal of the Western Naval Command and on his advice, turned himself in to the Deputy Commissioner of Police. The jury in the Greater Bombay Sessions court pronounced Nanavati as not guilty.
u00a0
In the Bombay High Court, the defence put forth their version of the incident, for which there were no witnesses other than the two men. The High Court agreed with the prosecution's argument that the murder was premeditated and sentenced Nanavati to life imprisonment for culpable homicide amounting to murder.
u00a0
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction. Nanavati spent three years in prison. Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit, then governor of Maharashtra, pardoned Nanavati. After his release, Nanavati, along with his family emigrated to Canada. Nanavati died in 2003.

EXCERPTS
The following are excerpts from the book Mumbai Fables where the writer takes one back to the Nanavati murder case and looks at it in the context of 1960 Mumbai.

While there are differences between the Grover case and the Nanavati case, there are certain eerie similarities too, especially with the way the Nanavati case and now the Grover case gripped the imagination of a country and how Mumbai was the stage where both these murders and human dramas were played out.

THE TABLOID AND THE CITY
It was April 27, 1959. As the day wore on, the oppressive humidity hung like a pall over the city. Deputy Commissioner John Lobo of the Bombay City Police was in his office, planning to escape the sweltering heat with a family holiday in the cool Nilgiri Hills...

Case for prosecution. Source: Blitz December 2, 1961

A little later, he heard a voice outside his office, asking "Lobo sahib ka kamra kahan hain?" (Where is Mr. Lobo's office?). A tall, handsome gentleman dressed in white shirt and slacks walked in and introduced himself as Commander Nanavati. He appeared to Lobo like a man in a hurry to unburden himself of something weighing on him.

"I have shot a man." "He is dead. I have just received a message from Gamdevi Police Station."

Commander Nanavati turned pale on hearing this. There was a pause. It was Lobo who broke the silence.
"Would you like a cup of tea?"

"Just a glass of water."

Later, Lobo describes the "feverish activity" at the Jeevan Jyot apartment building of the victim as the Gamdevi police officers investigated the scene in the crime. They noted the shattered glass in the nine-by-six bathroom, the bloodstains on the wall and door handle, and, lying on the floor, "the empty brown envelope bearing the name Lt. Commander K M Nanavati."
u00a0
Recalling the murder scene years later, Lobo could not resist a philosophical observation: "The evil that men do lives after them-it leaves 'footprints on the sands of time.'"

Thus began the sensational Nanavati case that consumed the city. It had all the ingredients of a thrilling drama extramarital sex, jealousy, and murder.

It also had a compelling and cosmopolitan dramatis personae Kawas Maneckshaw Nanavati, an upright Parsi naval officer; Sylvia, his beautiful English wife; and a rich, swinging Sindhi bachelor, Prem Bhagwandas Ahuja. The locus of the drama was decidedly upscale.

The Nanavatis lived in elegant Cuffe Parade, and Ahuja's posh apartment building on Nepean Sea Road (ironically named Jeevan Jyot or Flame of Life) was in the exclusive Malabar Hill neighbourhood.

The accused commander. Source: Blitz, October 24, 1959

This upper-class geography cast the case as a story about the cosmopolitan elite in the city. The murder case was fought all the way from the trail in the Bombay Sessions Court to the final appeal in the Supreme Court in Delhi.u00a0u00a0u00a0u00a0u00a0

MEET THE PRESS
Almost single-handedly responsible for turning Ahuja's murder into a gripping and enduring event in popular culture was the spunky Bombay tabloid Blitz. For nearly two and a half years after the trial opened on September 23, 1959, Blitz covered the case with outsize and relentless attention.

With bold front-page headlines, photographs, scoops, special features, boxed reports, and gossip, Blitz dramatized the case as a soap opera of morality and patriotism and played it on the stage of mass culture.
u00a0
The three chief protagonists were-a dashingly handsome naval officer devoted to the nation; his beautiful but impressionable wife; and an ultramodern, wealthy, and wily Lothario, who had wronged not just Nanavati but India itself by seducing a married woman while her husband sailed the seas in defense of the nation.
u00a0
There was also a fourth protagonist-Blitz and its dapper and dynamic Clark Gable look-alike, the Parsi editor Russi K Karanjia, a well-known figure in the city.

Under his direction, Blitz audaciously framed and broadcast the case of a murder in the city as an event of nationwide importance. Splicing lurid details and courtroom drama into a moral and patriotic story line, it staged the Nanavati case as a riveting media event, the first of its kind in India.

THE TRIAL
The trial opened on the afternoon of September 23, 1959...

During the month-long trial, which included a dramatic visit by the judge, jury, and the counsels to the murder scene, the following facts were established...

Nanavati goes to jail. Source: Blitz September 17, 1960

The commander had deposed that he found his wife tense and unresponsive to his affectionate touch on April 27.

"Do you still love me?" he asked. No reply.
"Are you in love with someone else?" he asked again. No reply.

"Have you been faithful to me?" Sylvia shook her head to indicate "No." To Nanavati, "this looked like the end of the world." He decided to shoot himself.

Nanavati, however, wanted to know from Ahuja whether he was "prepared to marry Sylvia and look after the children."...

When Nanavati walked into Ahuja's bedroom and asked him "Are you going to marry Sylvia and look after the kids," Ahuja nastily replied, "Do I have to marry every woman that I sleep with...Get the hell out of here..."
When Nanavati retorted, "By God, I am going to thrash you for this" and raised his hands to fight, Ahuja made a sudden grab for the envelope containing the revolver, which Nanavati had kept on the cabinet nearby. But Nanavati reached it first.

Ahuja suddenly gripped Nanavati's hand and tried to take the revolver by twisting Nanavati's hand. During the struggle, two shots went off.

THE VERDICT
Nanavati was not guilty of murder. By an eight-to-one majority, it also rejected the charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

The courtroom erupted in cheers. But Sessions judge Mehta brought the noisy celebration to an abrupt halt. He declared that the jury verdict was "perverse" in the light of the evidence marshaled in the trial and referred the case to the Bombay High Court.