shot-button
Lake Levels Lake Levels
Home > Mumbai > Mumbai News > Article > MAT orders force to re induct inspector who was forced to retire in 2015

MAT orders force to re-induct inspector who was forced to retire in 2015

Updated on: 16 March,2018 10:34 AM IST  |  Mumbai
Rahul Mahajani |

The Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) has asked the state government to take a police inspector who was forced to retire in 2015, due to an error in his birth record, back in service

MAT orders force to re-induct inspector who was forced to retire in 2015

Bharat Pardeshi. Pic/Sayyed Sameer Abedi
Bharat Pardeshi. Pic/Sayyed Sameer Abedi


The Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) has asked the state government to take a police inspector who was forced to retire in 2015, due to an error in his birth record, back in service. MAT passed the order on Bharat Pardeshi recently, and the file has been put forth before the Home department.


Pardeshi, who can consider himself reinstated owing to the MAT order, has just a few months left before he legitimately retires this June, and is awaiting his new posting from the department. Once reinstated, the government is supposed to pay him full salary since 2015 till date. Pardeshi, who has worked in several police stations in the eastern suburbs, including Trombay and Kurla, was posted in Chembur at the time of his retirement.


Spotting the error
The inspector had moved the MAT after finding out that his date of birth in the state's records was incorrect — his birth year had been noted down as 1957 instead of the actual 1960, forcing him to leave the force three years sooner. He had joined the force in 1979 as a constable with the Nashik police, and subsequently, cleared the departmental exam, becoming a sub-inspector.

It was around 2012 that he realised that his date of birth in the records was June 1, 1957, instead of June 22, 1960. Pardeshi asked the government, on two occasions, to rectify the error, but it wasn't done. "We filed a case before the MAT and provided relevant documents to support our case," said Pardeshi's advocate K R Jagdale.

The two sides
The government pointed out that as per service rules, Pardeshi should have brought up the error within five years of joining. Jagdale, however, said there was overwriting in the column bearing date of birth, and the department itself hadn't bothered to verify the date.

"Exciting news! Mid-day is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!


Mid-Day Web Stories

Mid-Day Web Stories

This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK