Mumbai: Court acquits man in live-in relationship of rape charge

The court has acquitted a 36-year-old man of charges of cheating and raping his live-in partner on the pretext of marriage, observing that their relationship does not come under the definition of rape

Mumbai: Court acquits man in live-in relationship of rape charge

Representational image

A Maharashtra court has acquitted a 36-year-old man of charges of cheating and raping his live-in partner on the pretext of marriage, observing that their relationship does not come under the definition of rape. S A Sinha, the district judge in her order last on Thursday stated the prosecution miserably failed to prove the charges against the accused, Shweta Vijay Kamal Sinha, a resident of neighbouring Mumbai, and he needs to be freed.

According to the prosecution, the 39-year-old woman, a resident of Mira Road who ran a salon, came in contact with the accused in 2001 and they got into a relationship. The man insisted they continue their relationship and promised to marry her. He was jobless hence the woman used to help him financially, the prosecution said. When the woman finally asked him for marriage, he disregarded the proposal with excuses like their different castes and she being elder to him.

The woman married another person in 2007 but separated within a year. The accused then again contacted her and the two continued their relationship when the woman became pregnant. According to the prosecution, the accused asked her to abort the baby, but she refused and gave birth to a girl in 2010. As the accused did not get married to the woman and threatened her, she filed a complaint against him and he was booked under Indian Penal Code sections 376 (rape), 417 (cheating), 506 (criminal intimidation), 504 (intentional insult with an intent to provoke breach of peace).

The judge said during her cross-examination, the woman admitted to being in a live-in relationship with the accused. "Thus, it cannot be said that the accused forcibly had sexual intercourse with her against her will. The accused and the complainant were in a live-in relationship and their relation cannot come under the definition of rape," the judge said. The man's lawyer also submitted that his client did not refuse paternity of the girl child and took responsibility for her and also paid maintenance to the woman.

"Therefore, I am of the view that the prosecution miserably failed to prove that the accused raped the woman on the pretext of marriage. There is also no satisfactory evidence of insulting, cheating, abusing and threatening the complainant. Hence, no more discussion is required," added the judge while acquitting the accused.