shot-button
Lake Levels Lake Levels
Home > Mumbai > Mumbai News > Article > Amruta Fadnavis bribe and extortion case Bombay HC dismisses plea of Anil Jaisinghani against illegal arrest

Amruta Fadnavis bribe and extortion case: Bombay HC dismisses plea of Anil Jaisinghani against 'illegal' arrest

Updated on: 03 April,2023 11:26 AM IST  |  Mumbai
PTI |

A division bench headed by Justice A S Gadkari said the plea was dismissed as it was without any merits

Amruta Fadnavis bribe and extortion case: Bombay HC dismisses plea of Anil Jaisinghani against 'illegal' arrest

Bombay High Court. File Pic

The Bombay High Court on Monday dismissed a petition filed by suspected bookie Anil Jaisinghani challenging his "illegal" arrest in a case of alleged attempt to blackmail and bribe Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis's wife Amruta Fadnavis.


A division bench headed by Justice A S Gadkari said the plea was dismissed as it was without any merits.


The Malabar Hill police station in south Mumbai had on February 20 registered a First Information Report (FIR) against Anil Jaisinghani and his daughter Aniksha Jaisinghani for allegedly threatening to make public certain audio and video clips that purportedly show Amruta Fadnavis accepting favours 
from Aniksha.


They were booked for offences under Section 120B (criminal conspiracy) and Section 385 (extortion) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8 (induce public servant using corrupt means) and 12 (abetment) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Also Read: Amruta Fadnavis case: Police says Anil Jaisinghani was 'main instigator', oppose bail plea

Aniksha, who was arrested on March 17, was granted bail in the case on March 27 by a sessions court.

Her father Anil Jaisinghani was later arrested by the Mumbai Police from Gujarat and he is currently in judicial custody.

In his petition in the HC, Anil Jaisinghani claimed he was illegally arrested in the case on March 19 but was not produced before the court within 24 hours as mandated in law.

His advocate Mrigendra Singh had argued that Jaisinghani was produced before the court in Mumbai 36 hours after his arrest.

Singh alleged that everything in the case was being monitored by the complainant's husband who is the deputy chief minister of Maharashtra.

State Advocate General Birendra Saraf had refuted the allegations and said the police followed all procedures properly and there had been no delay in producing Jaisinghani before the court for remand.
Saraf said the police had merely taken "possession" of Jaisinghani on March 19 and they wanted to produce him before the competent court in Mumbai.

He said as per the arrest memo, Jaisinghani was arrested on March 20 at 5 pm and was produced before the sessions court on March 21.

This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever.

"Exciting news! Mid-day is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!

Register for FREE
to continue reading !

This is not a paywall.
However, your registration helps us understand your preferences better and enables us to provide insightful and credible journalism for all our readers.

Mid-Day Web Stories

Mid-Day Web Stories

This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK