The NIA has claimed the human rights activist was an active member of the Communist Party of India (Maoist), a banned outfit
File Photo/PTI
Prima facie there was a nexus between human rights activist Gautam Navlakha, an accused in the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case, and Syed Ghulam Nabi Fai, an agent of Pakistan's spy agency ISI convicted in the United States for terror funding, a special NIA court has said in its order denying bail to the campaigner.
ADVERTISEMENT
Last month, the Bombay High Court had quashed an earlier order passed by the special judge and directed him to rehear Navlakha's bail plea. The HC had said the special court's order did not contain an analysis of the evidence relied upon by the prosecution.
Special judge Rajesh Katariya, presiding over the National Investigation Agency (NIA) court, after hearing the submissions afresh, denied bail to the 69-year-old activist on April 6. A detailed order was made available on Thursday.
Navlakha was arrested in August 2018 and initially placed under house arrest. He was moved to the Taloja Central Prison in Navi Mumbai in April 2020 after a Supreme Court order.
However, on November 10 last year, the Supreme Court allowed his plea to be shifted back to house arrest for a month. He is currently residing in the satellite city of Navi Mumbai.
The NIA has claimed the human rights activist was an active member of the Communist Party of India (Maoist), a banned outfit.
The anti-terror agency, in its chargesheet, has alleged the applicant (Navlakha) had visited the USA three times to address conferences organised by the 'Kashmiri American Council' (KAC), which is headed by Nabi Fai.
Also read: Mumbai Police bans flying activities in city till May 15, check details
The activist was in touch with US-based Kashmiri separatist Nabi Fai via email and sometimes through phone, according to the central agency.
Nabi Fai was arrested by America's Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in July 2011 for accepting funds from the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and the Pakistan government.
Navlakha had written a letter the US court judge presiding over Nabi Fai's case for clemency, the central probe agency has alleged.
The anti-terror agency further claimed Navlakha was introduced to a Pakistani ISI General for his recruitment by Nabi Fai on directions of the ISI, showing his nexus and complicity with the Kashmiri separatist and the spy agency of the neighbouring country.
The NIA court, in its order, noted that the prosecution had produced a copy of the document titled ¿SUPPLEMENTAL POSITION OF THE UNITED STATES WITH RESPECT TO SENTENCING FACTORS' pertaining to a case - United States of America versus Syed Ghulam Nabi Fai.
¿It (document) prima facie shows a nexus between applicant (Navlakha) and Syed Ghulam Nabi Fai,¿ the special court observed.
Though there appears to be some deviating conduct on part of the applicant as pointed out by his lawyer from the report on Navlakha and other documents, the same cannot grant any benefit to the applicant for bail, the court observed.
The special judge stated that the supplementary chargesheet and documents relied on by the prosecution ¿prima facie shows that the applicant is an active member of the said banned terrorist organization (CPI-Maoist) and he carries out activities in furtherance of the object of said organization¿.
The special court noted that documents produced along with the chargesheet ¿show active involvement of the applicant (Navlakha) in crime and participation in conspiracy and also that ¿he underwent weapons training with other accused¿.
¿Considering totality of material, role of the applicant cannot be segregated from role of the co-accused and there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accusation against the applicant are prima facie true,¿ it said.
Among other grounds for bail, Navlakha had cited his old age, various ailments and also pointed out that he has been in jail since the last 3 years.
However, the special judge, in his order, said in view of the seriousness of allegations made against Navlakha, ¿collective interest of community would overweigh in the case and the grounds put forth would not go in the favour of the applicant".
The case relates to alleged inflammatory speeches made at the Elgar Parishad conclave held in Pune on December 31, 2017, which the police claimed, triggered violence the next day near the Koregaon-Bhima war memorial on the outskirts of the western Maharashtra city.
The Pune police, which initially probed the case, had claimed the conclave was backed by Maoists. Later, the probe in the case, in which more than a dozen activists and academicians have been named as accused, was transferred to the NIA.
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever.
Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!
