Thane court acquits man accused of manhandling traffic cop in 2010

In Maharashtras Thane district a 41yearold man who was accused of manhandling a traffic police inspector in 2010 was acquitted by a sessions court According to a report in PTI the man was acquitted by Additional Sessions Judge VL BhosaleReportedly the court in its order dated November 8 had ruled in favour of the accused due to a lack of substantial evidence The order was made available on WednesdayThe PTI report citing the order also stated that the prosecution could not produce a satisfactory response to questions raised by the counsel for the accusedReportedly the Additional Public Prosecutor Varsha Chandane told the court that the incident happened on November 3 2010 at a chowk in the Naupada area of Thane city Chandane claimed that the accused had doubleparked his car He was then fined by the traffic cop for the violationThe report further stated that the accused allegedly claimed to be a Central Bureau of Investigation CBI officer and threatened the traffic cop The prosecution allegedly stated that the accused threatened the cop by saying he would ruin him and that he also tried to pull the cops nameplate and began pushing him and verbally assaulting himHowever Defence counsel Sachin Vaishampayan highlighted the deficiencies in the police investigation and prosecutions narrative He further stated that his client was not involved in the crimeThe judge according to PTI in his order did not only observe that the prosecution did not give a satisfactory response to queries raised by the defence but it also noted that showing ownership of the vehicle was not as important for the prosecution as it was to prove the presence of the accused on the spot The court noted that the prosecution has presented no evidence to that effectThe court noted as per the defences argument that no independent witness as examined by the prosecution appeared to be unsatisfactory too as the incident happened in a public place and there were many people watching it It also said that there were many shops at the spot but none were examined by the prosecution nor did they give any reason to not examine themThe court ultimately concluded that the prosecution had not convincingly demonstrated the alleged incidents occurrence including the accuseds obstruction of the officers duty and thus acquitted the accused giving him benefit of the doubtWith agency inputs