The news of the trial in the 2008 Malegaon blast case being shifted to Mumbai created a palpable sense of anticipation among journalists covering the courts. While reporters were no strangers to terror-related cases, this one stood apart for its perceived historical significance, many viewed it as a pivotal test for the concept of “saffron terror,” a term that was being introduced for the first time.

Journalists expected a tough legal battle, especially since the prime accused, Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, had already alleged before a magistrate in Nashik, where the case was initially filed, that she had been subjected to torture by investigators. Observers believed the courtroom would witness further dramatic developments as the trial progressed.

Adding to the case’s uniqueness was the striking diversity among the accused: the roster included a Sadhvi, a serving Indian Army Lieutenant Colonel, a retired Major General, and a priest, among others, all finding themselves on the wrong side of the law.