Updated On: 15 July, 2022 07:39 AM IST | Mumbai | Dilip D’Souza
Members of Parliament, beware of what you say, it might betray you by being pronounced unparliamentary and struck from Parliamentary records

A newspaper report from 1994 when a certain figure—420—was ruled not unparliamentary
In April 1994, the then chairman of the Rajya Sabha, the late K R Narayanan, was called on to settle a “recurring controversy” among the members of Parliament present. A Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) member, K L Sharma, drew his attention to something that he thought was “unparliamentary.” Narayanan had to decide if Sharma was right.
I have a feeling Narayanan would be ashamed at what’s happening now, a quarter-century later, with parliamentary things that have recently been pronounced unparliamentary. Then again, scratch that. He’s not allowed to be ashamed. Or at least, he’s not allowed to say he’s ashamed in Parliament. That word is unparliamentary.