Updated On: 12 July, 2024 04:05 AM IST | Mumbai | Shreemayi Nainwal
Activist lauds alimony ruling claims artificial fear being touted to suit a conservative few

Representation Pic
All the adjectives like ‘progressive’ and ‘historical’ used for the Supreme Court ruling that a divorced Muslim woman is entitled to seek maintenance from her husband under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) is not hyperbole but fits like the proverbial glove.
Superlative
This ruling is progressive, historical, and much more. It should have come a long time ago, and now that it is here, it is welcome. This, of course, happened because a divorced woman asked for alimony/maintenance. The family court upheld her right but that was challenged by her husband in the high court. When the high court ruled in her favour, it was challenged in the Supreme Court, and the highest court of the land too ruled in her favour, with a ruling that will positively impact Muslim women.