Home / Sports / Cricket / Article / Fakhar run-out: MCC says up to umpires to decide if Quinton's act was wilful

Fakhar run-out: MCC says up to umpires to decide if Quinton's act was wilful

Many in the Pakistan cricket circles blamed de Kock for "deliberately distracting" Zaman, leading to his dismissal. Former captain Waqar Younis and fast bowler Shoaib Akhtar questioned the South African's act.

Listen to this article :
Pakistan`s Fakhar Zaman walks back to the pavilion after his dismissal by South Africa`s Aiden Markram (not visible) during the second one-day international cricket match between South Africa and Pakistan at Wanderers Stadium in Johannesburg. Pic/AFP

Pakistan`s Fakhar Zaman walks back to the pavilion after his dismissal by South Africa`s Aiden Markram (not visible) during the second one-day international cricket match between South Africa and Pakistan at Wanderers Stadium in Johannesburg. Pic/AFP

Pakistan's Fakhar Zaman's contentious run-out in the second ODI against South Africa has sparked a debate on spirit of the game with Marylebone Cricket Club saying it was "up to the umpires to decide" if Quinton de Kock had attempted to mislead the batsman. In a stiff chase of 342, Zaman smashed a spectacular 193 in a losing cause as the batsman was run out in a controversial fashion involving South Africa wicketkeeper de Kock. The stumper pointed his finger towards Lungi Ngidi but the ball was, in fact, thrown by Aiden Markram towards the keeper's end and it was a direct hit. Zaman had slowed down his pace at the end of his second run and could not make it back into his crease. Replays showed that de Kock had seemed to convince Zaman into believing that the throw was going to the non-striker's end.

"Law 41.5.1 states: It is unfair for any fielder wilfully to attempt, by word or action, to distract, deceive or obstruct either batsman after the striker has received the ball," the MCC, custodians of the game, tweeted. In another, the MCC wrote, "The Law is clear, with the offence being an ATTEMPT to deceive, rather than the batsman actually being deceived. It's up to the umpires to decide if there was such an attempt. If so, then it's Not out, 5 Penalty runs + the 2 they ran, and batsmen choose who faces next ball." The debate around de Kock's gesture was whether he was intentionally attempting to deceive Zaman into thinking that the throw was headed for the other end, leading to the batsman slowing down his pace while going for the second run at the Wanderers on Sunday.

Trending Stories

Latest Photoscta-pos

Latest VideosView All

Latest Web StoriesView All

Mid-Day FastView All

Advertisement