Updated On: 07 December, 2019 07:33 AM IST | Mumbai | Michael Jeh
Why does a bloke on the grassy hill, full of beer and bad manners, get threatened with a life ban, but an abusive cricketer who knows his opponent and has been educated, not suffer a more draconian penalty?

Aussie pacer James Pattinson. Pic /Getty Images
If white line fever is used as a pathetic defence for cricketers who have brain snaps on the field of play, what do we call spectators who make racist, homophobic or similarly vile comments? Black C Syndrome? I refer here to the spectator who racially abused Joffra Archer in New Zealand recently.
What's interesting is the immediate (and unequivocal) support for a call to have this creature banned for life if his identity is ever discovered. It begs the question does it not – what makes his offence worthy of a life ban when a player found guilty of a similar offence gets off with a minor suspension?