Updated On: 21 February, 2016 10:25 AM IST | | Ian Chappell
<p>A simple return to the back-foot no-ball law will eradicate the existing confusion and inconsistency, writes Ian Chappell</p>

Umpire Richard Illingworth signals a no-ball after Australia's Adam Voges was clean bowled by New Zealand pacer Doug Bracewell at the Basin Reserve in Wellington last week
No one should be surprised that the front-foot no-ball law is creating controversy and confusion and that umpire Richard Illingworth's error gave Adam Voges a monumental reprieve in the Wellington Test.
In 1962, Richie Benaud asked Sir Donald Bradman (both favoured a back-foot law) to act as an umpire in the nets to prove how the then, new front-foot no-ball law was unworkable. When the photographs taken in that experiment were developed, Benaud found; “An umpire, on more occasions than not, would be calling no-ball when in fact the ball was perfectly legitimate, by something like half an inch. It was just that the umpire's line of sight was pushing the bowler's boot forward so it looked as though it was a no-ball.”