Bajrang Punia counters allegations of refusal to provide doping sample

Olympic medallist wrestler Bajrang Punia has claimed that he refused to provide urine samples during the selection trials in Sonepat in March because the dope control officials failed to furnish adequate proof that they were carrying proper equipment to conduct the testsThe Tokyo Olympic Games bronze medallist said he had only demanded an explanation from the officials as on one of the two previous occasions they NADA officials had come with expired kits while during other time they appeared with only one testing kit as opposed to the mandatory threeBajrang one of the countrys most successful wrestlers was suspended by National AntiDoping Agency NADA on April 23 after being served a whereabouts failure notice on April 18On Thursday wrestlings world governing body UWW also suspended him till the end of this year following NADAs decision to hand him a provisional suspension for refusing to undergo a dope test on March 10 in SonepatThis is to clarify that I have at no stage refused to give my sample for doping control On 10 March 2024 when I was approached by alleged doping control officials I merely reminded them that the last two times they came to collect my sample they had gotten expired kits once wrote Bajrang Punia on X on Fridayand on the other instance they had approached me with a single testing kit as opposed to the three testing kits added Bajrang who has been at the forefront of a protracted agitation against former Wrestling Federation of India chief Brij Bhushan Sharan SinghThe grappler who competes in the 65 kg category said he had sought an answer from the Dope Control Officers DCO on March 10 on why NADA was not responding to his queries regarding two previous lapses but he got no explanationI then sought an answer from them DCOs as the NADA did not provide an answer to any of my communications demanding an explanation for the same and informed them that I would give my sample upon receiving such explanation from themNot only did the doping control officials refuse to provide an explanation they did not provide me any proof on this instance of them carrying proper equipment and merely left from the venue where I was at claiming it to be a refusal from my end added BajrangAlso Read Asian Wrestling Olympic Qualifiers Grecoroman wrestlers fail to win quotaBajrang added that contrary to reports that he left the venue immediately he was present for almost one hour after the dope control officials had approached him for the sampleI continued to be at the venue as I had another bout scheduled for 34 position After my semifinal bout I met the SAI Sports Authority of India doctor at the venue for treatment regarding a knee injury suffered during the semifinals of the Wrestling Trials Ionly left the venue about an hour after the alleged doping control officials approached me contrary to how it has been portrayed that I left immediately added BajrangHe also alleged that the DCOs had not followed the norms which mandated them to stay till such time a wrestler submits his medical report to the competition managerThe dope controlling officer should have accompanied me till I submitted my medical report to the competition manager as per protocol rather than leaving in a hurry in middle of the trials to record my refusalEven if this incident is treated as refusal the fact that it was due to NADA using expired kits and not providing an explanation for using them or giving me comfort that they had not carried expired kits again should be considered as a compelling justificationI took such a stance solely because of the NADAs actions in the past which in the absence an explanation could continue a dangerous trend of the use of expired kits or noncompliance with doping control protocol It is my moral obligation towards the wrestling community and particularly the younger wrestlers that I exercised here he addedWith agency inputs