Home / Sunday-mid-day / / Article / Democratising art or invalidating it? Artists dissect the role of AI

Democratising art or invalidating it? Artists dissect the role of AI

The Ghiblification trend has once again sparked a debate over AI-generated art, but it has also brought joy to many who were unaware of the Japanese studio’s legacy

Listen to this article :
Singer-songwriter Siddhant Goenka uses AI to design music videos and album artwork; (right) Filmmaker and AI artist Varun Gupta uses AI to draw up retro-futuristic dreamscapes, comic strips, entire worlds, including this reimagined version of Mumbai, and a floating city. Pic/Varun Gupta

Singer-songwriter Siddhant Goenka uses AI to design music videos and album artwork; (right) Filmmaker and AI artist Varun Gupta uses AI to draw up retro-futuristic dreamscapes, comic strips, entire worlds, including this reimagined version of Mumbai, and a floating city. Pic/Varun Gupta

Lately, the Internet seems to have transformed into a Ghibli universe. People across platforms are sharing dreamy, AI-generated portraits of themselves in the unmistakable style of the Japanese animation house, Studio Ghibli.
 
But as with most viral AI trends, the reactions have been mixed. For some, this was a delightful moment of Internet whimsy. For others, it is a degradation of the legacy of Studio Ghibli co-founder Hayao Miyazaki, who had once said that AI-generated animation was an “insult to life itself”. But this time, there was a third response: Joy.

Most who have taken to the trend of sharing “Ghibli-fied” portraits have no idea who Miyazaki is; they may not have watched his iconic films, such as Spirited Away or My Neighbor Totoro. For them, the trend is not about his legacy; it’s about seeing themselves in art.

Trending Stories

Latest Photoscta-pos

Latest VideosView All

Latest Web StoriesView All

Mid-Day FastView All

Advertisement