shot-button
Ganesh Chaturthi Ganesh Chaturthi
Home > News > India News > Article > Parsi matrimonial disputes case Supreme Court agrees to list in February plea against jury system

Parsi matrimonial disputes case: Supreme Court agrees to list in February plea against jury system

Updated on: 25 November,2022 02:21 PM IST  |  New Delhi
ANI |

A bench of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and Justice Hima Kohli said it would hear the matter in February 2023 after an advocate mentioned it for listing

Parsi matrimonial disputes case: Supreme Court agrees to list in February plea against jury system

Representational Pic

The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to list a plea challenging several provisions of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936, which provides for a system of jury comprising community members to decide matrimonial disputes.


A bench of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and Justice Hima Kohli said it would hear the matter in February 2023 after an advocate mentioned it for listing.


The apex court had issued notice on the plea filed by a Parsi woman in December 2017.


The petition filed by Naomi Sam Irani stated that the provisions of the Act violated Article 14 (right to equality) and Article 21 (right to life and liberty) of the Constitution while citing a top court verdict declaring the practice of instant triple talaq used by Muslim men unconstitutional and violative of Muslim women's right to live with dignity.

Questioning the validity of provisions of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act (PMDA), Irani had said the procedure under the 1936 personal law is exasperatingly cumbersome, involving a system akin to a jury decision, and grants no access to mediation and settlement as available to Hindu women under the family court system.

The petition had challenged the Constitutionality of sections 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 30, 32(a), 46, 47(b) and 50 of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936.

Also Read: Gay couple moves Supreme Court seeking recognition of same-sex marriage

Section 18 of the Act provides for the constitution of Special Courts at Calcutta, Madras and Bombay, titled 'Parsi Chief Matrimonial Courts'. Section 19 provides for the composition, as per which the Chief Justice of the High Court shall appoint the judge of such Parsi Matrimonial court. The judge of the matrimonial court shall be aided by five delegates.

The petition stated that the five delegates are, for all practical purposes, a jury, as the delegates' verdict on facts is final and no appeal lies against the same.

The plea termed the provision as "archaic" and said it pre-dated independence and abolition of the jury system "in our criminal jurisprudence in the 1960s" and cannot be retained for one community alone.

She had set out the drawbacks of the jury system, which had resulted in its abolition in India.

"The jury delegates adjudicate a divorce petition based on their personal notion of societal norms, morality and ethics, which may not be in sync with the principles of natural justice and the ethos and dynamics of society," the petition stated.

This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever

"Exciting news! Mid-day is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!

Register for FREE
to continue reading !

This is not a paywall.
However, your registration helps us understand your preferences better and enables us to provide insightful and credible journalism for all our readers.

Mid-Day Web Stories

Mid-Day Web Stories

This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK