Replacing a concussed player is not such a perplexing problem during the pandemic. However, in normal times the touring party will be severely disadvantaged if they only have 15 players for a series while the home side can choose from a wider range.
Australia A all-rounder Cameron Green in a state of shock after being hit on the head from a shot by India�s Jasprit Bumrah (second from left) during Day One of the tour match at the Sydney Cricket Ground on December 11. Pic/Getty Images
A Test match, especially one played between two skilful and evenly matched teams like Australia and India, is appropriately named. Each game is a searching test of the players- skill, cricket intelligence and courage.
ADVERTISEMENT
In the first Test at the Adelaide Oval, it also became a test of everyone-s patience while Cheteshwar Pujara was in a state of glacial progress at the crease.
Nevertheless, it was the lead up to the Adelaide match where the players- courage was in the spotlight. The rash of concussion subs resulting from blows to the head is on the rise and it-s looming as a major headache for cricket.
Replacing a concussed player is not such a perplexing problem during the pandemic because teams are carrying an extended squad. However, in normal times the touring party will be severely disadvantaged if they only have 15 players for a series while the home side can choose from a wider range of replacements.
It may be that when if things return to normal, each team has to nominate a batting and a fast and spin bowling replacement before each match in case a concussion sub is required.
That then, raises the matter of like-for-like replacements.
This concept has already caused an international dispute when Indian all-rounder Ravindra Jadeja was concussed while batting during a T20I and was replaced by leg-spinner Yuzvendra Chahal. The heat rose in this argument when Chahal claimed three wickets and the player of the match award in India-s narrow victory.
Complaining about a player not being a like-for-like replacement seems pointless; it-s always going to be difficult to please all parties. It-s akin to driving in Sydney where you let a car into your lane because you know in five minutes time you-ll require the same courtesy from another commuter.
However, just addressing the concussion sub issue doesn-t get to the heart of the matter; it-s the rising number of batsmen hit in the head that then leads to the need for a replacement player.
Following the tragic death of Philip Hughes, Cricket Australia conducted a safety review. Incredibly, this process didn-t include technique which is the most important aspect of ensuring fewer batsmen receive blows to the head. The time is ripe for a worldwide review into on-field safety - it should include batsmen, bowlers and umpires - with batting technique a top priority. In conducting this review, it would be appropriate to strengthen any law regarding the protection of tailenders in facing short-pitched bowling.
Any talk of completely banning the bouncer should be dismissed as quickly as bowlers removed New Zealand batting bunny Chris Martin.
There were rumblings in the eighties about banning the bouncer when the West Indies were dominating. This wouldn-t have slowed the West Indies- superiority, but it would-ve resulted in regular batting exhibitions which are boring to watch and commentate on.
Such a change would also create problems for umpires in adjudicating on a no-bouncer law.
Often batsmen duck into a short ball and get hit. Many times a ball only bounces between waist and chest height but still hits a batsman in the head because he-s taken his eye off the ball and ducked. Will Pucovski-s latest concussion is a case in point.
Banning the bouncer would place even more responsibility on the already over-burdened umpires. In reality, if a top-order batsman gets hit he-s to blame, not the bowler. A fast bowler is attempting to disrupt the batsman-s footwork and his thinking; he-s not deliberately trying to cause an injury.
That said, with concussion replacements now mandatory there could be the temptation to bombard the opposition-s best batsmen in the hope of having him replaced by a lesser player. In this case, umpires would need to remind the bowlers their job is to dismiss batsmen, not dismember them.
The thing to remember in any discussion on bouncers is the cricketers- adage; if you don-t want to get hurt then don-t walk through the gate.
Clayton Murzello-s column, Pavilion End, will be back next week.
The views expressed in this column are the individual-s and don-t represent those of the paper
Keep scrolling to read more news
Catch up on all the latest Crime, National, International and Hatke news here. Also download the new mid-day Android and iOS apps to get latest updates.
Mid-Day is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel @middayinfomedialtd and stay updated with the latest news
Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!
