The Cabinet will remain in place on a caretaker basis until Parliament approves a new prime minister. A vote was scheduled by Parliament on Friday, but it has no time limit for filling the position. The caretaker Cabinet could also dissolve Parliament and call a new election.
Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin/ X
A court in Thailand on Wednesday removed Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin from office over an ethical violation, further shaking up Thai politics after it ordered the dissolution of the main opposition party a week ago.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Constitutional Court ruled on a case involving Srettha's appointment of a Cabinet member who had been jailed in connection with an alleged attempt to bribe a court official.
The court voted 5-4 against Srettha and the ruling removed him from office immediately.
The Cabinet will remain in place on a caretaker basis until Parliament approves a new prime minister. A vote was scheduled by Parliament on Friday, but it has no time limit for filling the position. The caretaker Cabinet could also dissolve Parliament and call a new election.
Srettha, speaking at Government House shortly after the verdict, thanked the judges for giving him the opportunity to defend himself. He said he respected the ruling and that he always sought to act ethically during his time in office, which was less than a year.
"I'm sorry that I'd be considered as a prime minister who's unethical, but I'd like to insist that I believe that is not who I am," he said.
The acting prime minister is expected to be Phumtham Wechayachai of Srettha's Pheu Thai party. Phumtham was first deputy prime minister and commerce minister under Srettha.
The Constitutional Court last week ordered the dissolution of the progressive Move Forward Party, which won last year's general election, over an accusation that it violated the Constitution by proposing an amendment to a law against defaming the country's royal family. The party has already regrouped as the People's Party.
The petition against Srettha was initiated by former members of the military-installed Senate who had refused to approve Move Forward's prime ministerial candidate when the party was attempting to form a government after its election victory. It was seen as a move favouring a pro-military political party in his coalition government.
Thailand's courts, especially the Constitutional Court, are considered a bulwark of the country's royalist establishment, which has used them and nominally independent state agencies such as the Election Commission to issue rulings to cripple or sink political opponents.
The Constitutional Court's rulings are "two judicial coups" that are "against international standards and upset the usual checks and balances in a democratic system," said Prajak Kongkirati, a political scientist at Bangkok's Thammasat University.
"It shows that Thailand currently is not a democracy and that the 2017 Constitution handed the judiciary and the independent organisations unbalanced power," he said, a reference to Thailand's current Constitution that was sponsored by the military government that staged a coup in 2014.
Srettha became prime minister in August last year, despite his Pheu Thai party finishing second in the general election. After Move Forward was denied power by the Senate whose term ended in May, Pheu Thai " then the biggest coalition partner of Move Forward " excluded it from the coalition and joined hands with parties affiliated the previous military-controlled government to gather enough support to approve a new prime minister.
In choosing a new prime minister, Parliament can select from a roster of candidates nominated for the post last year by the major political parties. The Pheu Thai party has two eligible candidates, including Paetongtarn Shinawatra, the daughter of former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra.
Another frontrunner would be Anutin Charnvirakul, head of the Bhumjaithai party, which ran third in last year's general election. He is currently a deputy prime minister and interior minister. Anutin, a powerbroker in the vote-rich northeast whose family owns a major construction group, has served in both a military-backed government and the civilian one that it replaced.
Also in the running would be two former senior military officers: Prayuth Chan-ocha, who served as prime minister for nine years after staging a coup in 2014, and Prawit Wongsuwan, who was one of Prayuth's deputy prime ministers.
Srettha had appointed Pichit Chuenban as a minister of the Prime Minister's Office in a Cabinet reshuffle in April. Pichit was jailed for six months in 2008 on contempt of court charges after he allegedly tried to bribe a judge with 2 million baht ($55,000) in cash in a grocery bag over a case involving Thaksin, the former prime minister.
Pichit resigned from the post weeks after being appointed when controversy over the incident was revived.
The court said that although Pichit had already served his jail term, his behaviour" as ruled by the Supreme Court " was dishonest. Srettha as prime minister has sole responsibility for vetting the qualifications of his Cabinet nominations, the court ruled. It said he knew about Pichit's past but still nominated him, and therefore it ruled that he violated the ethics codes in the Constitution.
Srettha, 62, was a real estate executive before entering politics. He prioritized opening up Thailand after almost a decade of military-backed rule, frequently travelling abroad for trade negotiations. His party pushed a populist plan for a 10,000 baht ($286) handout policy to stimulate the economy, a key promise in its campaign last year, though it has been delayed by technicalities largely involving funding.
His government also promoted Thai cultural products through a "soft power" agency and the critical tourism sector by loosening entry requirements and other measures.
Srettha, who tried to project an image of a strong CEO, was seen by critics as an agent for Thaksin, who returned from self-imposed exile in August last year in a plea deal his detractors say was essential to Srettha gaining the premiership.
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever
Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!
