Updated On: 14 November, 2021 08:19 AM IST | Mumbai | Prutha Bhosle
Should India have taken a different stance at COP26, when it bowed out of a deforestation reversal deal? Experts weigh in on the repercussions on Maharashtra’s shining glory

Mudumalai is Tamil Nadu’s top wildlife-spotting place. It is located in the Western Ghats. Pic courtesy/Sandeep Pulla
Since 1751, the world has emitted over 1.5 trillion tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2). To reach our climate goal of limiting average temperature rise to 2 degree Celsius, the world needs to urgently reduce emissions. Forests are integral to this fight against climate change because of their ability to absorb carbon. But over the last few decades, rampant deforestation is taking away this self-defence tool from the Earth. And therefore, the recently-concluded COP 26 UN Climate Change Conference, hosted by the UK in partnership with Italy, in which 197 nations participated, proved to be a critical summit.
A series of deals were announced, among which ending and reversing deforestation by 2030 was the most crucial one. More than 100 world leaders promised to sign the pledge, including Brazil, home to the Amazon rainforest. India, however, bowed out, expressing its unwillingness to commit to reversing deforestation.